Writing AI Marketing Copy That Doesn't Sound Like AI
Specificity beats prompting for "punchy" or "engaging"
There's a reason so much AI-generated marketing copy feels the same: "unlock," "elevate," "seamless," "game-changing," three-item lists with an em dash. That's not a flaw in the model — it's what happens when a prompt is vague enough that the model falls back on the most statistically common way to sound like marketing copy. Here's how to prompt around it.
Ban the stock phrases directly
The single highest-leverage fix: explicitly list the words and patterns you don't want.
Give it a real voice sample
Instead of describing your brand voice abstractly ("friendly but professional"), paste 2-3 sentences you've actually written and ask the model to match that specific register. Models are much better at pattern-matching a concrete example than interpreting an adjective.
Specify what the copy is competing against
"Write ad copy for my app" gives the model no sense of the actual decision the reader is making. "Write copy for a landing page where the visitor is comparing us against doing nothing (not against a competitor)" changes what argument the copy makes.
Ask for options that differ in strategy, not just wording
Asking for "5 variations" often produces 5 versions of the same idea reworded. Instead, ask for variations that take different angles:
Cut ruthlessly, or ask the model to
AI copy tends to over-explain. A useful closing instruction: "Now cut this by 40% without losing the core claim." Models are often better at editing down their own draft than at writing tight on the first pass.
PromptLab's marketing templates
The marketing category in PromptLab's template library bakes in voice-matching and stock-phrase banning by default, so you're not rebuilding these constraints from scratch on every campaign.
TRY THE MARKETING TEMPLATES →